‘Buddy’ Review: Casper Kelly Turns Children’s TV Nostalgia Into a Twisted Horror Playground
- Travis Brown

- 49 minutes ago
- 3 min read

Casper Kelly has spent years proving how effectively familiar television formats can be pushed into increasingly surreal territory. With Buddy, his feature-length horror film arriving in theaters August 28, Kelly takes that instinct and applies it to one of the most recognizable pieces of childhood nostalgia: the bright, educational children’s television show.
Starring Cristin Milioti, Topher Grace and Delaney Quinn, Buddy is built around the fictional program It’s Buddy!, a colorful world of songs, lessons, oversized characters and carefully manufactured happiness. At the center is Buddy, a bright orange unicorn whose cheerful presence begins to feel considerably different once the children around him stop playing by the rules.
That premise is not entirely new. Horror has spent the past several years revisiting retro television, mascots, puppets and children’s programming through increasingly darker lenses. What separates Buddy is how fully Kelly commits to the television world itself.
Rather than constantly pulling the audience in and out of the artificial environment, the film spends enough time inside the show to make its rules, characters and visual language feel complete. The sets, pacing and performances all work toward the illusion of a children’s program that could have existed somewhere between Pee-wee’s Playhouse, Barney and the stranger corners of late-night television reruns.
That commitment gives the film room to gradually shift its tone.
The cheerful songs and colorful staging are not simply decoration before the horror begins. They are part of the mechanism. Kelly uses repetition, performance and the rigid expectations of children’s television to create tension before the violence becomes more explicit.
Delaney Quinn plays Freddy, one of the first children to recognize that something within Buddy’s world is wrong. Caleb Williams and Tristan Borders join her as the younger characters begin questioning what is happening around them, while Madison Skyy Polan also becomes part of the group trying to understand the rules governing their environment.
Milioti and Grace bring additional weight to the ensemble, but the film ultimately belongs to the television world Kelly has built and the way the younger cast navigates it.
One of the more effective ideas in Buddy is the sense that nearly everyone inside the program is replaceable except Buddy himself. That dynamic fits naturally within the disposable structure of children’s television, where supporting performers, sets and segments can change while the central mascot remains untouched.
Kelly finds plenty of horror in that imbalance.
The film also expands beyond the immediate novelty of a killer children’s-show character. As the story develops, Buddy begins suggesting that the world surrounding the program may be larger and more complicated than it initially appears.
That is where Kelly’s sensibilities become most recognizable.
His work has always been interested in what happens when a simple concept is pushed several steps beyond where another filmmaker might stop. Too Many Cooks is probably the clearest example, beginning as a television parody before mutating into something increasingly difficult to categorize. Buddy operates with the same instinct, though within the demands of a feature-length narrative.
That ambition produces both the film’s strongest ideas and some of its limitations.
There are moments where the movie feels like it is trying to contain several different concepts at once, and not every character development or piece of violence lands with the same impact. Some of the deaths are less effective than the atmosphere surrounding them, and the film occasionally reaches for more than its central premise requires.
Still, the overall execution is strong.
The pacing is controlled, the production design is convincing and the transition from nostalgic children’s programming into horror is handled more smoothly than in many recent films working with similar material. Even when the concept feels familiar, Kelly’s approach gives it enough personality to avoid becoming another simple mascot-horror exercise.
The result is one of the more successful recent attempts to use childhood media nostalgia as a horror framework.
Whether Buddy immediately connects with a large theatrical audience is another question. Its strange combination of children’s television parody, slasher energy and surreal genre storytelling may ultimately be the kind of movie that grows more aggressively once it reaches streaming and wider home audiences.
But as a feature, it demonstrates that Kelly’s ideas can survive beyond short-form experimentation.
Buddy is not entirely original in concept, but it is one of the more refreshing versions of this particular trend. The film knows exactly what makes old children’s television comforting, strange and occasionally unsettling, then uses those qualities to create something that gradually becomes more dangerous without losing the identity of the world it built.
For viewers familiar with Kelly’s work, that progression will make sense. For everyone else, Buddy may be the introduction that explains why his approach to horror remains so difficult to predict.
Horror Movies Uncut: 3.5 out of 5




Comments